Legal Opinion

Jim 72 Properties, LLC v. Montgomery Clearners

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 16, 2015No. Case No. 2:15-cv-7543-ODW (FFMx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS FELIPE P. RENDON AND REN-DON PROPERTIES, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS [15]

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Jim 72 Properties, LLC brings suit against multiple defendants, including Felipe P. Rendon and Rendon Properties, LLC (collectively “Rendon”). Plaintiff claims to have a valid and lawful assignment to all rights to bring environmental claims relating to a specific parcel of real estate in Wilmington, California (the “Subject Property”). Rendon argues that the assignment is conditional and not absolute, and therefore Plaintiff…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bassler v. Stephens Institute CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Millman v. United Technologies CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  3. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Vanir Construction Management, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API