Jim 72 Properties, LLC v. Montgomery Clearners
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS FELIPE P. RENDON AND REN-DON PROPERTIES, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS [15]
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Jim 72 Properties, LLC brings suit against multiple defendants, including Felipe P. Rendon and Rendon Properties, LLC (collectively “Rendon”). Plaintiff claims to have a valid and lawful assignment to all rights to bring environmental claims relating to a specific parcel of real estate in Wilmington, California (the “Subject Property”). Rendon argues that the assignment is conditional and not absolute, and therefore Plaintiff…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bassler v. Stephens Institute CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Millman v. United Technologies CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Vanir Construction Management, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2023