Roberts v. Wachter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
The complaint herein alleges that in. 1942, plaintiff, an active member of The State Bar of California, organized the produce firm of Drudis, Means and Waehter, with assets valued at $6,500 furnished by defendant Drudis and $20,000 cash furnished by the latter’s wife. That Means and Waehter were taken in as partners but furnished no capital. Defendant Drudis was to take no active part, but under an oral agreement between him and plaintiff, the profits from his share of the business were to be divided between them in consideration for plaintiff’s services in organizing the business,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- McComsey v. LeafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sims v. PurcellIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Roberts v. WachterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.