Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlos Aguilar, AKA Cheeks

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2002No. 00-50502PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

After a two-day trial, a jury convicted Carlos Aguilar (“Aguilar”) of conspiring to distribute and to aid and abet the distribution of controlled substances. He was sentenced to 121 months. On appeal, Aguilar contends that the district court violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause by admitting the guilty pleas of non-testifying codefendants as evidence of the existence of a drug conspiracy. We disagree. We hold that the admission of an unavailable codefendant’s guilty plea does not violate an accused’s rights under the Confrontation Clause when that plea…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Parle v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API