Legal Opinion
Parle v. Runnels
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2004No. Nos. 02-16896, 02-17281PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Circuit Judge.
David L. Runnels, Warden of the High Desert State Prison, appeals an order of the district court granting a writ of habeas corpus to Timothy Charles Parle, a prisoner in his custody who was convicted of murder in the first degree.1 The district court held that the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied Supreme Court precedent regarding the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, and that the cumulative prejudicial effect of errors at trial deprived petitioner of a fair trial in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Petitioner…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Parle v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- State v. KaufmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Adilao Ortiz v. James YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mitchell Carlton Sims v. Jill Brown, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.