Legal Opinion

Bolin v. Scheurer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1941No. 32,649PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

On certiorari to the industrial commission, we must review a finding that when injured, Clayton Bolin, the claimant, was the employe of and entitled to compensation from John Scheurer, Jr. and not the city of Mankato.

Scheurer, an excavating contractor, owned and operated a gasoline shovel and.two trucks. Since June, 1939, Bolin had driven one of these trucks on various projects, for which he received an hourly wage. Having heard that Mankato would be needing excavating facilities for reducing certain street surfaces to proper level after installation of curb and gutter,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Rouse v. Town of Bird IslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Wass v. Bracker Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Larson v. Le MereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Moorhead v. GrassleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Koktavy v. City of New PragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API