State v. Tyndall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
At issue is the construction of G.S. 90-95(h)(3)(a). Defendant contends that the provision does not prohibit the sale of a mixture unless that mixture contains 28 grams of cocaine. We disagree.
Article 5 of Chapter 90 is the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act. It was amended in 1979 to include G.S. 90-95(h). Prior to that time, G.S. 90-95(a) made it unlawful to manufacture, sell or deliver, or possess with the intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver, a controlled substance. G.S. 90-95(h) added penalties for “trafficking” in certain type controlled substances. The present…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- United States v. George F. Holt, D.P.M.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Drane v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Lewis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.