Legal Opinion

State v. Tyndall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1981No. 8110SC602PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

At issue is the construction of G.S. 90-95(h)(3)(a). Defendant contends that the provision does not prohibit the sale of a mixture unless that mixture contains 28 grams of cocaine. We disagree.

Article 5 of Chapter 90 is the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act. It was amended in 1979 to include G.S. 90-95(h). Prior to that time, G.S. 90-95(a) made it unlawful to manufacture, sell or deliver, or possess with the intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver, a controlled substance. G.S. 90-95(h) added penalties for “trafficking” in certain type controlled substances. The present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. United States v. George F. Holt, D.P.M.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Drane v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lewis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API