Legal Opinion

Brandenburg v. Seigfried

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The only question presented for decision is whether the finding and judgment of the circuit court are in accordance with the law and the evidence. The action was to recover the possession of real estate, the plaintiffs claiming as owners in fee simple. The finding and judgment were for the defendants.

The rule is familiar that, if entitled to recover at all in such a case, the plaintiffs must recover on the strength of their own title. Under this rule the finding of the court upon the evidence adduced was manifestly right.

The title to real estate, in order to be good, must be traceable to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Behler v. WeyburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Williams v. WilburIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Huddleston v. IngelsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Doe v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Levering v. ShockeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Wilhite v. HamrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Muncie Electric Light Co. v. JoliffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. City of Lafayette v. WortmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API