Doe v. West
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to tbe Harrison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
In this case there was a judgment for the defen*134dant in ejectment. We are informed by the record that, on the trial of the cause, the plaintiff produced no patent from the government to Iielh, from whom he derived his title; but a deed of conveyance was produced from Heth and wife to Ogden, in which deed it was mentioned that Heth held the premises by patent from the president.of the United States of America. Com, veyances were also produced from Ogden and wife to Baird, and from Báird and wife to Wood, the plaintiff’s lessor. The plaintiff also proved that Baird was in peaceable possession of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Love v. Simm's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Sims Lessee v. IrvineSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
- Troublesome, on the demise of Dougherty v. EstillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Brandenburg v. SeigfriedIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Holten v. Board of Comm'rsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Donald v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
- Galbreath v. Doe ex dem. ZookIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.