City of Lafayette v. Wortman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
íSTiblack, J.
Action by Daniel P. Wortman against the .city of Lafayette, for injury to an alley in which he claimed to have an interest.
The complaint charged that at the time of the injuries com*405plained of, the plaintiff was, as he still is, the owner in fee simple of lot No. 102, in Perrin’s addition to the city of-Lafayette ; that at the time he became the owner of said lot, there was, and afterwards continued to be, an alley along the northern boundary thereof which had been i-egularly laid out and dedicated to public use, and which was used by the plaintiff and other adjoining lot-owners…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- City of Evansville v. DeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- City of Kokomo v. MahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Logansport v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hickman v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Burkam v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Jenkins v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Stein v. City of LafayetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.