Legal Opinion

Levering v. Shockey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1885No. 11,651PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Colerick, C.

This case is concisely and correctly stated by the appellees in their brief, as follows:

“ This was an action commenced by the appellee Sophia E. Shockey, a married woman, to cancel a mortgage executed by her on her separate property to the appellant William H. Levering, trustee, to secure a debt of her husband, Robert C. Shockey.
“ The appellant Eliza J. Heath, being the beneficiary for whom Levering acted as trustee, was made a party defendant.
“The mortgage was executed on the 15th day of March,, 1880, and the complaint is based on the 10th section of the act concerning married…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Welz v. RhodiusIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Mather v. ScolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Behler v. WeyburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Pickett v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ward v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Phillips v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Smith v. McClainIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API