Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1976No. 7514SC498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court, in its final mandate, to instruct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty if they should find that defendant acted in self-defense. Defendant contends that under State v. Dooley, 285 N.C. 158, 203 S.E. 2d 815 (1974), this is reversible error.

The trial judge is required to instruct the jury as to the law -based-on the evidence presented. G.S. 1-180. The judge is to charge-on all substantial features of the case which arise from the. evidence; and .all defenses presented by the evidence are substantial features of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. HippSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API