Legal Opinion

People v. Branshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contentions that the court unduly restricted the scope of a Massiah-Cardona hearing (see, Massiah v United States, 377 US 201; People v Cardona, 41 NY2d 333), or that defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel during the hearing. The court permitted, and defense counsel in fact pursued, all relevant areas of questioning. The court’s decision that the informant was not acting as an agent of the government is amply supported by the record.

The court was not authorized to permit the victim’s mother to speak at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. RaucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. McCarthy, New York County Courts1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. KnappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. SnicklesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Ferrara v. KeaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  5. People v. SaddlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API