Legal Opinion
Ashok v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 30, 2003No. 2:01-cv-01311PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendant Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “Defendant”), moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment dismissing the Complaints of Plaintiff Uma Ashok (“Ashok” or “Plaintiff’). The Court heard oral argument on June 27, 2003.
This is an employment discrimination case in which Plaintiff originally filed two separate actions. In CV-01-1311, Plaintiff claims that beginning in November 1992 she was subjected to a hostile work environment because of both her national…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Frisenda v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF MALVERNEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Johnson v. Strive East Harlem Employment GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Morisseau v. DLA PIPERDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Burroughs v. PetroneDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Kim v. Goldberg, Weprin, Finkel, Goldstein, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.