Legal Opinion

Frame v. Cassell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. — 0. W. Mullan, Judge. Suit to recover a commission. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

I. As said, plaintiff brought suit to recover a commission. There seem to have been two suits, originally. They were instituted in justice’s court, and there were no written pleadings. There was an appeal to the district court, and a consolidation of the two cases there, and a trial without a paper issue, and it is somewhat difficult to ascertain what issues were, in fact, tried out; but it is fairly apparent that the principal and unsuccessful defense was accord and satisfaction.

l. tbial : instructions: failure to object: showing In avoidance. Most of the complaints made on appeal here…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dimond v. Peace River Land & Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. American Fruit Product Co. v. Davenport Vinegar & Pickling WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Chumbley v. CourtneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Shull v. McCrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Eley v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Noble v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Robinson v. Norwest Bank, Cedar Falls, N.A.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1988
  4. Goodwine v. AyresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Goben v. Des Moines Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API