Shull v. McCrum
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Ch&rolcee District Court. — W. D. Boies, Judge. Appellees had judgment at law fqr attorney fees. Defendant appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
■Salinger, J.
1. Appeal and error : ab- . stract of record : presumption. I. The appellees make the point that the appeal cannot be heard, because the abstract of appellant and the record contain no statement that same contain the evidence, because there is no certificate of any kind or character, and because it is not even shown that the case was tried by a court and jury.
We have to say: It is presumed;that the abstract contains the record. No affirmative statement that it contains the evidence, or otffier certificate, is iequired. And we think it sufficiently appears that the case was tried…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jordan v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Perin v. CathcartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Gillespie v. AshfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Redding v. PageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Haefer v. MullisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kellogg v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Campfield v. RuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Olson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Frame v. CassellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Gross v. WallenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.