Legal Opinion

Eley v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 18, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wright District (Jourt.- — E. M. Wright, Judge. Action for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

i. carriers : interstate commerce : when employee so engaged. Defendant, at the time of the accident-causing the injuries complained of, was engaged in operating a line of railway extending from Hayfiekl, Minnesota, to Clarion, Iowa, and to other points, Plaintiff was employed as a conductor, and on the day of the accident, was in charge of a work train (known as Extra No. 130), employed in distributing ties at various points along the route between Clarion and Thornton, stations in Iowa on defendant’s line, for use in repairing the track. The injuries were received about 9:10 P. M., while…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Zikos v. Oregon R. & Navigation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1910

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slatinka v. United States Railway AdministrationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  2. Frame v. CassellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Lammars v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API