Legal Opinion

Dimond v. Peace River Land & Development Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 10, 1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Boone District Court. — E. M. McCall, Judge. Action to recover the purchase price of certain laud sold by the defendants to the plaintiff, on the ground that the purchase was induced- by fraud. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

— This action is brought to recover from *402defendants the.amount of money paid on a written contract for the purchase of lands. Plaintiff claims to have rescinded on the ground of fraud.

It appears that the defendant the Peace River Land &' Development Company is a corporation organized in this state, and authorized to sell land in Florida; that the defendant E. O. Montgomery is its president; that, on the 27th day of February, 1911, the plaintiff, through her husband, made application to the land company in substantially the following language :

“I hereby contract to take a farm of forty acres…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Central Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Chumbley v. CourtneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Wiley v. Dean Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hall v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Rosen v. Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Pullan v. StruthersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Allen v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API