United National Bank v. Searles
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION
Appellee, by its complaint, sought an in personam judgment of $26,461.61, possession of secured personal property, foreclosure of liens, sale of personal property, a deficiency judgment and costs. From a default judgment in the amount of $10,405.86 entered in favor of appellee, appellant motioned to vacate this judgment which mo*290tion was denied. Appellant takes this appeal attacking the jurisdiction of the trial court to enter the deficiency judgment. Finding his appeal meritorious, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellee, United National Bank, on March 26, 1979, commenced…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- McComb v. AboelessadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- MANSO-JARES, LTD. v. PetersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Walker v. DallasArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In the Interest of D.F.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.