Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.F.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2007No. 23990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Mother’s and Father’s parental rights were terminated in an abuse and neglect proceeding. Mother was served by publication and failed to appear at any of the hearings.1 She subsequently moved to reopen, challenging the State’s due diligence in attempting to locate her before the service by publication. She also challenged the circuit court’s refusal to reopen to redetermine her parental fitness. The circuit court denied relief. We affirm.

[¶ 2.] D.F. was born on October 22, 1994, in Illinois. When D.F. was less than a year old, Mother brought him and his sister (born…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. State v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Yankton Ethanol, Inc. v. Vironment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People in the Interest of EdjSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In the Interest of S.P.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re R.W. and N.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Bunker v. CIGNA Health Management, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
  3. Dairyland Insurance Company v. JarmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re DFSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re R.W. and N.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API