Legal Opinion

Miller v. Stroud Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 2002PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Paul Miller and Mary Miller (Appellants) appeal from the August 28, 2001, and November 16, 2001, orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court). The trial court’s August 28, 2001, order denied Appellants’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Motion for Leave) and granted the Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (First Motion) filed by Stroud Township and Stroud Township Sewer Authority (collectively, the Township). The trial court’s November 16, 2001, order granted the Township’s subsequent motion for summary judgment (Second…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Altoona Area School District v. CampbellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Burger v. Borough of IngramCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Graybill v. Providence TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. EOJ v. Tax Claim Bureau of Schuylkill CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kowalski, B. v. TOA PA V, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Star v. RosenthalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Krasny v. Bagga (In Re Jamuna Real Estate LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. City of Warren v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API