Legal Opinion

Shockey v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 30, 1983No. 1 CA-IC 2947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERSON, Presiding Judge.

Four issues are raised in this special action review of an Industrial Commission decision upon review which reversed an award for continuing benefits:

1. Whether the failure of the administrative law judge (judge) to render a decision upon review within sixty days pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-943.F. (Supp.1983) left the judge without jurisdiction to enter the decision upon review.

2. Whether the decision upon review is sufficiently specific.

3. Whether the decision upon review is supported by the evidence.

4. Whether the judge was required to authorize benefits for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Demaris v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State v. FancyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Baudanza v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. McCurry v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Chappell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API