Stone v. City of Providence

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

-Affirming.

Tbe question presented in the appeal of these consolidated cases is this: 0, the owner of a lot in the city of Providence, a city of the fourth class, mortgaged it to M. Thereafter the street in front of this lot was improved under ordinances, duly passed by the City of Providence and an apportionment was levied upon the lot of ,0 for his part of the cost of such improvement. 0 elected to pay the apportionment on the ten-year payment plan (see Kentucky Statutes, sec. 3575), and, in accordance with the statute, duly entered into an agreement in…