Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mattingly

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 12, 2003No. 2001-CA-001096-DGPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KNOPF, Judge.

The Commonwealth brings this matter on discretionary review from an opinion and order of the Marion Circuit Court which set aside a conditional guilty plea entered by Joseph Corey Mattingly to the charge of driving under the influence (DUI), first offense. 1 The Commonwealth asserts that when it elects to prosecute a DUI charge under KRS 189A.010(l)(a), a defendant may not present any evidence attempting to prove that he or she was not under the influence of alcohol. Rather, the Commonwealth contends that the defendant’s blood- or breath-alcohol concentration is the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Springer v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dillingham v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. FulkersonKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. WirthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cawood v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Luke Hospital, Inc. v. StraubKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Harris v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lopez v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Epperson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
  5. Mary Schulkers v. Kathleen LapeKentucky Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API