Herbert C. Heller & Co. v. Hunt Forbes Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Drury, Commissioner
Affirming.
This is the second appeal of this case. See 1 S. W. (2d) 970, 222 Ky. 564. On the first appeal, the judgment was reversed, because certain property owners had not been made parties to the action. Upon the return of the case, the Hunt Forbes Construction Company amended its petition, and made the following parties defendants: Hays Nelson, Frank Ross, P. H. Williams, and P. H. Williams, as guardian of P. H. Williams, Jr. — to whom. we shall refer as the property owners. In their amended petition, the plaintiffs made the further allegation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Herbert C. Heller & Co. v. Hunt Forbes Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stone v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- City of Mount Sterling v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Hargis v. W. T. Congleton Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- City of St. Matthews v. TrueheartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
- Security Trust Co. v. Louisville Title Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.