Legal Opinion

Lilly v. City of Irvine

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 11, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Hobson

Affirming.

Irvine is a city of the fourth class. It brought this suit September 4 1926, against Grant E. Lilly, alleging in the petition, in substance, these facts: By resolutions, ordinances, and proceedings, duly passed by the city council, it caused Broadway street to be constructed with a concrete base and top of Kentucky rock asphalt at the •exclusive cost of the real estate abutting on the property, according to the number of feet abutting thereon, •except the street intersections which were paid for by the city, and in October, 1924, apportioned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barfield v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Dressman v. Farmers' & Traders' National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. Dressman v. SimoninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stone v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Hargis v. W. T. Congleton Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. W. T. Congleton Co. v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API