Legal Opinion
Sutton Import-Export Corp. v. Starcrest of California
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 23, 1991No. 90 Civ. 4021 (RPP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
This is an action alleging copyright, trademark, trade dress and design patent infringement and various common law violations. Defendant Starcrest of California (“Starcrest”) moves for summary judgment on all counts pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
Starcrest is a California corporation conducting business solely as a mail order company with no retail stores or outlets. Plaintiff Sutton Import-Export Corporation (“Sutton”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ppx Enterprises, Inc., Mod Music, Inc., and J.H. Records, Inc., Ppx Enterprises, Inc. v. Audiofidelity Enterprises, Inc. And Dante J. PuglieseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Pacesetter Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996