Legal Opinion
Pacesetter Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1996No. 6:93-cv-06205PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
This is a commercial dispute between the owners of an automobile franchise (“Pacesetter”) and the Nissan Motor Corporation (“Nissan”) as well as Nissan’s related financing company, Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (“NMAC”). Pacesetter’s controlling shareholders, Angelo Ingrassia and Vincent Pellegrino (“plaintiffs”), assert that they were injured and suffered damages as the result of actions taken by Nissan and/or NMAC in response to plaintiffs’ attempts to sell or move the Pacesetter dealership. Presently before me is Nissan and NMAC’s joint motion…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc. v. Upstate Testing Laboratory, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Arthur Glick Truck Sales, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Vantage Mobility International LLC v. Kersey Mobility LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020