Legal Opinion

In re the Contempt of West

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1974No. 7425SC235Published

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

Proceedings for contempt are governed by Chapter 5 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and are classified as either “direct” or “indirect,” depending upon whether they are committed within or beyond the presence of the court. Galyon v. Stutts, 241 N.C. 120, 84 S.E. 2d 822 (1954); In Re Edison, 15 N.C. App. 354, 190 S.E. 2d 235 (1972); see Snepp, The Law of Contempt in North Carolina, 7 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1.

To constitute direct contempt, the conduct does not have to occur in the courtroom, but “[a] direct contempt consists of words spoken or acts committed in the actual or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cromartie v. Commissioners of BladenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Galyon v. StuttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Willard Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. In Re Imprisonment of PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. In Re the Imprisonment of EdisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API