Legal Opinion

In Re Imprisonment of Palmer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1965No. 370PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Direct contempt of court is punishable summarily, and the offended court is only required to “cause the particulars of the offense to be specified on the record.” In re Burton, 257 N.C. 534, 126 S.E. 2d 581; Calyon v. Stutts, 241 N.C. 120, 84 S.E. 2d 822; G.S. 5-5. No appeal shall lie from an order of direct contempt; G.S. 5-2; Luther v. Luther, 234 N.C. 429, 67 S.E. 2d 345. A contemner imprisoned in consequence of a judgment of direct contempt may seek relief by habeas corpus. However, the only question open to inquiry at the habeas corpus hearing is whether, on the record, the court which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Galyon v. StuttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. In Re CroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NiccumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. In Re WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. In re the Custody of WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API