Legal Opinion

De Rochfort Co. v. Sunshine State Bank (In Re De Rochfort Co.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided August 24, 1982No. 19-12122PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

Both the defendant and the intervenor have filed timely motions for new trial. (C.P. Nos. 21, 22, 23 and 24). The motions were heard on August 23.

All the statements made in the Memorandum Decision of August 6 after the third paragraph, page 2, that is to say beginning with the words “Turning to the question immediately presented ...” are to be disregarded.

The debtor cannot recover its leasehold interest as an avoidable preference in this case, because its transferee (the defendant bank) in turn transferred the lease before…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Florida Land Holding Corp. v. McMillenSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merril v. Dietz (In Re Universal Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1986
  2. Schaps v. Bally's Park Place, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. v. Weitzner (In Re Kavolchyck)District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
  4. Belford v. Breck (In Re Medical Cost Management, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
  5. Weitzner v. Goldman (In Re Kavolchyck)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API