Legal Opinion

Buzar v. First National Bank of Greenville

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1886No. 2105PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

The cause of action in the court below was a promissory note executed by one J. B. Pennington to appellee. Appellee originally sued Pennington alone, but by amendment made appellant a party defendant, alleging that the latter and Pennington were partners in the cattle business, and that the note was given for a partnership debt of that firm.

The leading question in the case is whether a partnership existed between appellant and Pennington or not. The main facts in relation to this matter appear in the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh findings of the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. GrinnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Cothran v. Marmaduke & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Goode v. McCartneyTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Ruddick v. Otis & SnowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. Holbrook v. Oberne, McDanield & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Karl and Kelly Company, Inc. v. McLerranTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. YarbroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  5. Fink v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API