Legal Opinion
United States v. Rogers & Rogers
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 22, 1958No. Civ. 19487, 19769PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
These actions were brought in the name of the United States, pursuant to § 2 of the Miller Act [49 Stat. 794 (1935), 40 U.S.C.A. § 270b], by the Los Angeles Testing Laboratory and D. L. Holliday, suppliers of labor and materials for a Government school-construction project, against the partnership of Rogers and Rogers, prime contractor for the project, and its surety [see Miller Act § 1, 49 Stat. 793 (1935), 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a].
In each action the defendant prime contractor has answered and asserted a counterclaim against the plaintiff mate-rialmen and the Government’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- AR Moyer, Inc. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Floor Craft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Parma Community General Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.