Warner Co. v. Leedom Construction Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, J.:
This case involves an interpretation of Section 3324 Revised Code 1935, which is a part of the Mechanics’ Lien statute. That section creates the right of lien. It requires a materialman to file a statement of claim within ninety days after the last delivery of materials in order to obtain a lien against the property. It also sets out what information must be included in the statement. It contains the following language:
*459“Any judgment obtained upon such claim, as hereinafter provided, shall become a lien upon such building, house or structure, and upon the ground upon which the same…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Maryland Brick Co. v. SpilmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Hensel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
- Iannoti v. KalmbacherSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Leedom Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Wilmington Trust Company v. Branmar, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
- Ramsey v. DiSabatinoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975