Legal Opinion

Warner Co. v. Leedom Construction Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 28, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

This case involves an interpretation of Section 3324 Revised Code 1935, which is a part of the Mechanics’ Lien statute. That section creates the right of lien. It requires a materialman to file a statement of claim within ninety days after the last delivery of materials in order to obtain a lien against the property. It also sets out what information must be included in the statement. It contains the following language:

*459“Any judgment obtained upon such claim, as hereinafter provided, shall become a lien upon such building, house or structure, and upon the ground upon which the same…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Maryland Brick Co. v. SpilmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  3. Hensel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  5. Iannoti v. KalmbacherSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Leedom Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  2. Wilmington Trust Company v. Branmar, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
  3. Ramsey v. DiSabatinoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API