Legal Opinion

Iannoti v. Kalmbacher

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 23, 1931No. 97PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

Our reports abound in cases construing the Mechanics’ Lien Statute and many phases of this difficult subject have been considered.

The question here involved, however, of the necessary parties defendant where the lien is filed by a sub-contractor by virtue of a contract with the main contractor has never been considered. Indeed the very use of the term “parties” as used in connection with the inception of the litigation is somewhat anomalous. Under our statute (section 2843 of the Revised Code of 1915, as amended by 29 Del. Laws, c. 225) the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
  2. Armstrong & Latta Co. v. Wilmington Sugar Refining Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. In re Republic Engineering Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Department of Community Affairs & Economic Development v. M. Davis & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. Warner Co. v. Leedom Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  3. Finnegan Construction Co. v. Robino-Ladd Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
  4. Stockman v. McKeeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Rockford Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API