Legal Opinion

People v. Sadows

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2009No. Docket 286689 and 286693PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The prosecution appeals by right the trial court’s orders granting defendants’ motions to quash the informations. Because MCL 257.625, as amended by 2006 PA 564, does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws, and because it does not deny defendants their rights to equal protection and due process, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

i

In Docket No. 286689, defendant, Colleen Sadows, was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), MCL 257.625(1), a misdemeanor. Because Sadows was previously convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HubbardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. PittsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. HaynesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. PerkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Whitman v. Lake Diane Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. Konopka (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. GratschMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. PinkneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Charles T. Wilson v. Noah NagyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API