Legal Opinion

People v. Perkins

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2008No. Docket 281957 and 281959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The prosecution appeals by leave granted the trial court’s decision on reconsideration to grant defendants’ motions to quash. The trial court originally determined that all prior drunken driving convictions could properly be considered for purposes of enhancing a sentence under MCL 257.625. However, on reconsideration, the trial court concluded that it had erred in its earlier determination. And it agreed with defendants’ contention that only convictions that occurred after January 3,1997, which was 10 years before the date that amended MCL 257.625 became effective, 1 could be considered for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BlantonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. SadowsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People of Michigan v. Marco a Lopez-HernandezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. People of Michigan v. Mark Anthony VarnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API