Legal Opinion
People v. Haynes
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 2003No. Docket 244327PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant was charged with operating a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, third offense (ouil 3rd), MCL 257.625(1) and (8). Defendant moved to strike a prior conviction for operating a vehicle by a minor with a bodily alcohol content, MCL 257.625(6), that was used to enhance the OUIL charge. The trial court granted this motion and the prosecution appeals the trial court’s order by leave granted. We reverse and remand.
I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 23, 2002, defendant was stopped in the vehicle he was driving by a police officer in St. Clair…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Eric William KingsleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. FonvilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. Konopka (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. SadowsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. DewaldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. WestmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.