Legal Opinion

Vanerson v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 18, 1999No. 97-1582PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLDAWAY, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. NEBEKER, Chief Judge, filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

HOLDAWAY, Judge:

The appellant, Samuel Vanerson, appeals the August 1997 decision of the Board of *256Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) which determined that he was not entitled to service connection for a seizure disorder. The Court has jurisdiction of the case under 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the following reasons, the Court will vacate the decision of the Board and remand the matter for readjudication.

I. FACTS

The appellant served on active duty in the U.S. Army…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  3. Stegall v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
  4. Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  5. Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Regis M. Quirin v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
  2. Dale S. Horn v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
  3. Maxson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  4. Cotant v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
  5. Orland R. Marsh v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API