Legal Opinion

Wiseman v. Boren

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1976No. 49087PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice:

This is an application for this Court to assume original jurisdiction and issue writ of prohibition to prohibit Respondents from transferring further surplus from the State’s General Revenue Fund to a Sinking Fund for the purpose of retiring State bonds without prior legislative appropriation.

Petitioner’s request stems from an announcement by Respondent, Governor David Lyle Boren, that he had ordered the transfer of $80,265,824.66, representing surplus funds that had accrued to the State Treasury as of June 30, 1975, from the General Revenue Fund of the State to a Sinking Fund…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. McCain v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Hines v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Oklahoma Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Price v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API