Legal Opinion
Miller v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 6, 1998No. 19-11205PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW
The instant adversary proceeding (“the Proceeding”) arising in the now-Chapter 7 bankruptcy case of MAIN, INC. (“the Debtor”), is in substance an effort by the driving force in a predecessor proceeding reported at 213 B.R. 67 (Bkrtcy. E.D.Pa.1997) (“Main II”), 718 ARCH STREET ASSOCIATES (“Arch”), a creditor of the Debtor whose counsel has now been appointed as special counsel for MITCHELL W. MILLER, the Debtor’s Trustee (“the Trustee”), to clean up a few issues left unresolved by our decision in Main II. In Main II we decided that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Donaldson v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re WrightUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Miller v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- In Re Main, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Miller v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL57 COMBINED FUNDS v. BarlowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.