State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, J.
At pertinent times prior to the controversy involved herein, respondents Francis Brown and Mary Rose Brown were the named insureds in an automobile liability insurance policy issued them by appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The vehicle, identified in the policy as the “described automobile,” was a 1965 Chevrolet owned by the Browns. On January 11, 1971,' while respondent Mary Rose Brown was driving the Chevrolet, it was involved in a collision with an automobile operated by respondent Elsie Cloud. State Farm thereafter brought this action for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Oakland Paving Co. v. Whittell Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. VincentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by10 opinions
- Borders v. Great Falls Yosemite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. California Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- FARMERS INSU. CO. v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Fujimoto v. Western Pioneer InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Sampson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.