Legal Opinion

Union Camp Corp. v. Whitman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1975No. 74-661PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

Initially, this case presents the question of whether the Court of Appeals was correct in dismissing *443the appeal on the basis of Fortner v. Thomas, supra (22 Ohio St. 2d 13).

Fortner involved the availability of R. C. 11.9111 as a means of appealing the adoption of regulations by the Ohio Liquor Control Commission to the Court of Common Pleas; that is, the right to judicial review by that court of quasi-legislative proceedings. In finding that no such right existed under the above statute, this court relied upon the language in Section 4(B) of Article IV of the Constitution of Ohio, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Zangerle v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. DeLong v. Board of Education of Southwest School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Union Camp Corp. v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Williams v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District v. ShankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Conley v. ShankOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. City of Middletown v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API