Legal Opinion
Shaw v. UN. COMP. BD. of REV.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 1988No. Appeal, 564 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Claimant Bruce E. Shaw appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review de nying his claim for benefits. Specifically, the board found the claimant ineligible for unemployment compensation because his dismissal was the result of willful misconduct.
The claimant raises three issues:
1. SEPTAs urine test policy and its application in this case violated the claimant’s fourth amendment rights because SEPTA did not have a reasonable suspicion of drug abuse by the claimant.
2. The board erred in concluding that claimant had engaged in willful misconduct…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Wilson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Szostek v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Singleton v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Architectural Testing, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Brunson v. COM., UNEMPLOYMENT BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Architectural Testing, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008