Szostek v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Smith,
Claimant, John Szostek, appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the referees denial of benefits to Claimant pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law (Law) 1 . We affirm the decision of the Board.
The questions to be determined by this Court are whether the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence of record; whether Claimants admission of drug use to Employers medical director was admissible; and whether Claimants conduct constitutes willful misconduct. Claimant was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Fritz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- George's Inc. v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Turner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Greer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Singleton v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.