Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1998No. 90039PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHargrave, J.

¶ 1 The issue is whether the Oklahoma Legislature’s amendment of Article 9 § 18a of the Oklahoma Constitution to provide for pay increases during the terms of office of the Corporation Commissioners violates Article 23 § 10 of the Oklahoma Constitution, which prohibits change in the salary of any public official during the official’s term of office unless otherwise provided. The pay raise for the Corporation Commissioners was implemented by Title 74 O.S. § 250.4, which raised the salaries of several state officers beginning with their terms of office on or after January 1995. We find that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Fair School Finance Council of Oklahoma, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Riley v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Presley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Julian v. Secured Investment AdvisorsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. State Ex Rel. MacY v. BD. OF COM'RSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API