Michalak v. Boston Palm Corp.
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
Introduction
Plaintiffs, Jason Michalak, Patrick Geherin and Toirm Miller (collectively “Plaintiffs”), are former employees at the Boston Palm Restaurant (“Palm”). They bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated alleging that the defendant distributed the service charge billed to private function customers in violation of G.L.c. 152A. They also allege various tort claims1 based on Palm’s service charge distribution policy.
Before me is the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the statutory claim and the motion for class certification. Defendant has filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fernandez v. Four Seasons Hotels, Ltd.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007
- Moore v. Barnsider Management Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2006
- Sagar v. FiorenzaMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014