Adams v. Henderson
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP UTAH. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice HaelaN
By a final decree of the District-Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the Territory of. U tah a contract for the sale of certain land, made March 27, 1890, between L. B. Adams and W- N. Shilling on one side, and Edward A. Beed and H. H. Henderson on the other'side, and three promissory notes given by the purchasers, together with a mortgage executed by them to secure the payment of such notes, were adjudged to be null and void.. It was also' adjudged that Henderson and Burgitt — the latter having become guardian of the person and estate of Need who was incapable of conducting his own…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Gillespie v. MoonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- United States v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Robert Green v. Charles Scully, Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,126 in Re Men's Sportswear, Inc., F/k/a Claude Clement, Ltd., Debtor. Men's Sportswear, Inc. v. Sasson Jeans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Westerlund v. Black Bear Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Hoffman v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.