Boord v. Kaylor

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the complaint, but since that precise question was presented and decided on the prior appeal, the law of the case relative to that contention has been settled: Benlow v. The James John, 61 Or. 153 (121 Pac. 899). The complaint, in the absence of demurrer and after verdict, is sufficient.

Defendant asserts that the court erred in allowing plaintiff to answer, over his objection and exception, the following question:

“The question is, Mr. Boord, why you came to make this check out to Mr. Beatty,”

the reply being:

“After we had our filings all fixed up and the…