Legal Opinion
Stewart Becker, Ltd. v. Horowitz
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1978PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leon D. Lazer, J.
Embroiled in a dispute with other stockholders, Stewart Becker, Ltd. (Becker) and another petitioner, each claiming to be the holder of 25% of the corporate stock of Indian Head Tennis Club, Inc. (the corporation), seek to dissolve the corporation pursuant to section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law. In their answer the respondents, Herbert Horowitz and Louis Schure, holders of the remaining 50% of the corporate stock, have pleaded various affirmative defenses and alleged, inter alia, that petitioners do not hold the requisite percentage of shares to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pacific National Bank v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Matter of Petition of Argus Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Denihan v. DenihanNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Siegel v. 141 Bowery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bankers Trust Co. v. RoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. DodgenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Benincasa v. GarrubboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Danny's Const. Co., Inc. v. Birdair, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Andrews v. Troy Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- In Re Dissolution of Twin Bay Village, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.