Legal Opinion

Overbeek v. Nex

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 87, Calendar No. 36,766PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

John Overbeek, plaintiff, sustained severe injuries while loading a truck for his employer, the Hay "Weaver Company. The ulna of his left forearm was cracked, and the radius completely fractured, causing a displacement which protruded to the skin. His employer took him to defendant, Dr. Harry A. Nex, who set the arm, and administered the subsequent treatment. Upon application duly filed, plaintiff was allowed compensation, and an agreement was entered into with the insurers of the employer wherein compensation was fixed at $18 per week, with the period of disability undetermined. After…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Wood v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Oleszek v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Polucha v. LandesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. Iowa Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hancock v. HallidayIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API